To
achieve pre-entry education that will develop the needed
capabilities requires a complete re-engineering of the
educational process. This includes defining objectives,
content, design and methodology. Piecemeal responses to
educational reforms will not suffice.
Major
Components
Efforts to
change education for accounting require consideration of
five major components of higher education:
|
Curriculum
Students
Faculty
|
Universities
Accreditation
|
Curriculum
Basing
pre-entry education on capabilities will mean fundamental
changes in the curriculum. The current textbook based,
rule-intensive, lecture/problem style should not survive
as the primary means of presentation. New methods, both
those used in other disciplines and those that are
totally new to university education, must be explored.
Some of the alternatives for student involvement include
seminars, simulations, extended written assignments and
case analyses. Creative use of information technology
will be essential.
The use of new
teaching methods will be a message in itself. Students
learn by doing throughout their education much more
effectively than they learn from experiencing an isolated
course. The skills and knowledge comprising the needed
capabilities must be integrated throughout the
curriculum. For example, if students are to learn to
write well, written assignments must be an important,
accepted and natural part of most or all courses. To
relegate writing to a single course implies to students
that the skill will not be useful throughout their
careers and does not require continuing attention. The
capabilities must be reinforced throughout the curricular
experience.
Teaching
methods must also provide opportunities for students to
experience the kinds of work patterns that they will
encounter in the public accounting profession. As most
practice requires working in groups, the curriculum
should encourage the use of a team approach.
The
development of an efficient curriculum requires attention
to integration. Re-engineering the curriculum should
include a careful evaluation of topical coverage in all
subjects. Emphasis should be placed not only on the
presentation of relevant material, but also on the
compounding of learning by appropriate combination across
course and departmental lines. When knowledge and skills
learned early in a university experience are expanded on
in work at a later stage, the student's experience is
reinforced and enriched.
Faculty
A vital,
knowledgeable, creative professoriate is an essential
part of the educational process. Most accounting faculty
base their course content on information gained through
secondary sources-usually textbooks and sometimes
standards. They frequently lack other significant,
continuing sources of information about the realities of
the practice environment. The challenge for the public
accounting profession is to assist in developing new ways
to maintain a knowledgeable, practice-oriented
faculty.
Accounting is
a particularly difficult profession in which to maintain
a high level of understanding of practice because neither
of the two common ways of gaining information about
practice is available to accounting faculty. Some
professions (for example, most health-related fields) use
clinical model, where faculty are simultaneously
practitioners and teachers. Often these faculty treat the
most difficult cases or circumstances and thus are not
only current in the profession but are also at the
"cutting edge" of practice development. At this time,
very few accounting faculty are actively involved in
practice.
In some
professions, much of practice is a matter of public
record available to faculty for study and analysis. Law
professors may go to their library to find many examples
of current practice methods and results. The
confidentiality provision for accountants prevents
faculty from having access to a robust continuing source
of information about the evolution of
practice.
The
nonclinical, confidential nature of accounting creates a
faculty that designs and executes pre-entry professional
education without direct knowledge of current
practice.
Where other
professions enjoy much interaction with their teaching
faculty, accounting has a persistent "schism" problem.
The classroom experience is diminished by the distance
between pedagogical content and practice reality.
Academics and practitioners would benefit from the
stimulation and challenge that come from a meaningful
association.
There is no
model for increasing interaction between academics and
practitioners in a nonclinical, confidential profession.
Current efforts to integrate academicians in the practice
include seminars, internships and joint conferences.
While these efforts are commendable, a much greater level
of activity must be achieved. Innovative methods to
increase interaction between the practitioners and the
professoriate must be created.
Students
Increases in
educational requirements may exacerbate the current trend
toward declining enrollments. In the free market of
academic major selection, students will have to be
convinced that the additional investment is worthwhile.
Significant increases in tuition or time must be offset
by stimulating curriculum and the expectation of
increased opportunities upon graduation. Efforts to
increase educational requirements must also be consistent
with the objective of maximizing opportunities for
minorities in the profession.
Universities
To achieve a
comprehensive re-engineering of the accounting curriculum
will require a major effort from faculty. Currently, most
institutional reward structures do not attach a high
value to curriculum development activities. To ensure the
necessary faculty input, individuals must be rewarded for
their contributions.
While the
responsibility for designing the specifics of the
curriculum appropriately rests with the faculty, the role
of university administrators cannot be ignored. Without
appropriate leadership and support from deans and central
administrations, re-engineering of curricula will be
impossible.
Accreditation
Accreditation
standards have a significant impact on accounting
education. At this time, the American Assembly of
Collegiate Schools of Business is the sole accrediting
agency for college-level schools of business, management
and accounting in the United States. The AACSB has
recently initiated a major review of the accreditation
process.
Accreditation
standards must be responsive to the desired outcomes of
educational preparation as outlined in this paper. The
accreditation process must also be sensitive to, and
supportive of, the innovation and experimentation that
are inherent in curricular change.