The
reorientation of accounting education from the
preparation of financial statements to an expanded
economic/financial information development and
distribution function will involve restructuring and
reorienting university accounting educational materials.
University accounting faculties will likely formulate
various approaches to the task of determining what to
teach, when to teach it, and how to present it to
students.
Without
implying that this illustration is the only framework for
improving university accounting education, the following
example of a conceptual structure indicates the nature of
the potential changes that may be made. The outline is
designed to span multiple types of information systems
for decision making, including the well-established
system for preparing financial statements.
Broadly
viewed, accounting involves (1) the selection,
observation, and identification of
significant phenomena about the activities of an
organization; (2) the measurement of the selected
phenomena by assigning symbols (words and numerals) to
represent them (journal) and storing the symbols in a
database (ledger); (3) the analysis and processing
of the symbols to reveal relationships among the observed
phenomena and to develop models (accounting reports) of
an organization's parts, setting, and activities over a
period time; and (4) the disclosure of the
developed information to various decision
makers.
Traditionally,
accounting education has taught students to observe
events, select those that deserve recording as
transactions, measure them according to a
conventional object classification system at exchange
price, analyze the recorded transactions to reveal
relationships in income and balance sheet related types
of operating reports, and distribute the reports
as aids in management control and capital
formation.
To improve and
reorient accounting education materials, universities
need to expand instruction in the accounting functions of
observation, selection, measurement,
analysis and disclosure. The concepts of a
transaction serves the accounting profession well in
providing useful information to managers, investors, and
others for decision making purposes. In today's economic
society, however, the transaction is only one of many
concepts implicit in the information accountants must
learn to develop and distribute.
Surrounding
events and internal and external environmental
circumstances need also to be observed by
accountants to identify additional relevant information
for both long-term and operating decision making. For
example, accounting students need to learn to identify
key internal and external variables (i.e., market share,
employee turnover, etc.) that influence the activities of
a particular organization, program, or object. Accounting
students also need to learn to distinguish between
relevant and irrelevant phenomena for their various
reports, requiring background knowledge of organization
goals and management objectives. At the same time
accounting faculties need to direct research towards
finding means of increasing the reliability of all
relevant information. Accountants may or may not use
methods similar to those used in the past, which
introduced bills of sale, invoices, purchase orders,
written contracts, and other documentary evidence to
provide reliability.
Teaching
students to perform the measurement function will
require educational material on two essential activities:
(1) the identification of the attribute(s) of the
observed phenomena to be measured (e.g., value,
historical cost, current cost, revenue opportunities);
and (2) the selection of an appropriate measurement scale
(nominal-classification, original-ranking, interval-range
and probability spread, and ratio-single numeral).
Accountants now use the nominal scale routinely and
conventionally in assigning well-know symbols (names) to
phenomena (e.g., "current assets," "inventories"). They
also use extensively the ratio scale in assigning
numerals to represent some type of value to a nominal
(classification) measure. Both probability and range
(interval) measures and ranking (greater than, equal to,
or less than) scales have been proposed as means for
accountants to improve the scope and accuracy of their
information disclosures. Future accounting students
should learn these additional measurement methods.
Accounting faculties may wish to include material on all
four measurement scales and illustrate their use in
developing information for decision making as part of the
accounting curriculum.
When
accounting faculties educate students for the
analysis function of accounting, they may find it
necessary to include in accounting courses various
qualitative and quantitative techniques (statistics,
mathematical model building, expert systems methods,
etc.) to develop multiple types of relationships among
recorded phenomena in the expanded accounting database.
Associated with the development of this additional
information will be the need for accounting students to
learn to market the new information products. In
addition, accounting faculties may decide that effective
performance of the accounting analysis function will
require that future accounting students take university
courses dealing with systems analysis and information
processing in order to be prepared for future accounting
practice and to place the study of accounting in a
meaningful perspective.
Finally, the
restructured and reoriented accounting educational
curriculum will place greater emphasis on the information
distribution function. To prepare students for
effective information dissemination, accounting faculties
may add accounting courses that assure meaningful
communication (written, oral, and behavioral, using
various formats), that develop advisory skills in
suggesting uses of information, and that provide an
understanding of the economics of information.
Economics is
the root discipline of accounting. Research in the
economics of information emphasizes the importance of
cost-benefit tradeoffs in deciding on the complexity of
formal information systems. For example, the widely-used
accounting model is only one source of information.
Accounting students should be well grounded in
cost-benefit thinking and should recognize that an
accounting system is not necessarily always the optimum
way to gather information.
Within the
foregoing framework for future accounting education as an
information development and dissemination structure,
current accounting practice in preparing financial
statements may constitute the main accounting information
system. Other accounting information systems, however,
will need to be added to the university accounting
curriculum; for example, for management and government
control of strategies, administration, and operations;
for specific projects such as mergers and acquisitions;
for long-term planning and implementation; and for many
other purposes.
This outline
illustrates the conceptual feasibility of broadening and
increasing the relevance of university accounting
education to the full scope of accounting practice at all
levels. Some universities may adopt this framework
immediately; others may use it as a general guide for
improving current programs. Still others may develop an
entirely different framework for future accounting
education. But all should perceive that it is possible to
restructure and reorient university accounting education
without abandoning a commitment to assure that accounting
students learn to prepare and use traditional accounting
reports.