Most
college courses are planned by a single faculty member
or, in a course with multiple sections, by a small
faculty group. In planning a course, faculty are most
strongly influenced by their academic discipline, their
scholarly and pedagogical beliefs, and their
understanding of the purpose of education. They will also
be influenced by the local context, including textbooks,
student characteristics, college and program mission and
goals, and external constituencies such as accrediting
bodies or professional associations (Stark et al,.
1989).
In planning a
course most faculty first consider the content to be
covered. Then they may consider how it will be covered
and what students will be doing in the course. We suggest
careful attention to the process by which students
will learn as well as to content. To facilitate course
planning we suggest the following questions:
- What do I
want students to know at the end of this
course?
- What do I
want students to be able to do at the end of
this course?
- What
attributes of intentional learning will students
develop in this course?
Many faculty
"inherit" courses with departmentally mandated objectives
or even a standard syllabus. Some courses are essentially
"designed" by the choice of textbook, which may come with
test banks, practice sets, teacher guides, lecture
outlines, even overheads. Faculty teaching such courses
may change textbooks or tinker with detail of the
syllabus, but they seldom have the opportunity to
reconfigure the course as a whole. We suggest that the
questions offered here, and particularly the attention to
learning attributes, could be a starting point for
revitalization of such courses.
When
considering the learning process as part of the course
plan and purpose, faculty need to be aware of factors
that can discourage learning. Many circumstances in
American higher education work against the attributes of
learning that we are suggesting here. Some of these
obstacles include class size, student preparation and
readiness, college climate and expectations, and the
size, shape, and furnishings of available classrooms.
Faculty can work around many of these deterrents to
assure that at least some of the learning attributes are
included in each course. The curriculum should be planned
and coordinated so that while acquiring content, the
accounting student will also develop and use all of the
attributes of intentional learning.
Several models
exist for the course planning process. Some involve
systematic use of faculty development staff, others
encourage colleague consultation, either within or across
departments. All these approaches to course design have
in common attention to the content, the learner, teaching
strategies, learning activities, and the course context.
These can be addressed in any order, but all should be
covered in the course plan. (For more on course design,
see Stark and Lowther, 1986; Diamond, 1989; Lovell-Troy
and Eickmann, 1992.)
To aid in
planning a course to include learning to learn, we
suggest using the matrix depicted in Figure 4.3. The
matrix includes three aspects of a course which we will
be discussing later in this chapter; we see these aspects
as major influences on the development of the attributes
of intentional learning. A course plan might consciously
include attention to one or more of the attributes of
intentional learning. While some courses might emphasize
one attribute, the most advanced courses should call upon
students to use all five attributes of intentional
learning.
|
FIGURE
4.3
CULTIVATING THE ATTRIBUTES OF
LEARNING
|
|
|
|
Attributes
|
Teaching
Strategies
|
Learning
Context
|
Results
and
Evaluation
|
|
QUESTIONING
|
|
|
|
|
ORGANIZING
|
|
|
|
|
CONNECTING
|
|
|
|
|
REFLECTING
|
|
|
|
|
ADAPTING
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example,
to use the matrix to design a junior/senior level course
in federal tax, an instructor would begin by drafting
answers to our three questions about the course: What do
I want students to know, to do, to develop as learners?
The instructor might produce a list of 5 to 7 principles
of taxation that students should know and technical
skills that they should be able to demonstrate. The
instructor would consider that these students have
completed two or three years of college work, including
at least one year of accounting principles. The students
would probably have some ability to question and to
organize knowledge, but would need help with the other
learning attributes. Since tax would be a new aspect of
accounting for them, the course should include ways to
help them see where taxation fits in the knowledge
structure of accounting. The instructor will want to help
them connect knowledge about tax with their understanding
of the objectives of financial reporting and also with
their understanding of business, political processes, and
historical events.
Using the
matrix depicted here, the instructor will consider
teaching strategies that encourage questioning,
organizing, and connecting in our tax course. She will
adjust the learning context, in so far as possible, to
make students comfortable with the class and with each
other. She will articulate the results she hopes to
achieve and devise means for evaluating them. For
example, she might want the students to know enough about
taxation so that they can recommend strategies to
minimize taxes for a client. She might plan a variety of
teaching strategies from introductory lectures about tax
law to a case study that requires students to analyze a
business's liabilities. She might plan a final project
that evaluates the results of learning by asking students
to study a set of facts and data and make recommendations
to a hypothetical client that would minimize the client's
taxes. Students in such a course could be expected to ask
questions, organize knowledge, and make connections as
they learn about taxation. They would reflect on their
learning and adapt it to new circumstances in the final,
evaluative project.
To prepare
students to succeed in such a course, the instructor
needs a syllabus that sets out her goals and the
processes she will use to reach them. Students accustomed
to passive learning may resent being required to involve
themselves in analysis, discussion, and group projects
with the teacher as a guide instead of a leader and
organizer. Students need to understand the reasons for
their own discomfort and for the teaching/learning
strategies used in the course. A discussion of course
goals as suggested in Chapter 3 could be helpful. Faculty
who expect students to develop learning attributes need
to include these attributes in the course goals and help
students understand the relationship between the
attributes and the teacher's role, teaching strategies,
and learning activities of the course.
The sections
that follow in this chapter will suggest how aspects of
the course might encourage the attributes of learning.
These aspects-teaching role or strategies, the learning
context, and course results and evaluation-can all be
planned to emphasize any one or all of the learning
attributes. Faculty who want to include attributes of
learning in an accounting course should plan specifically
how each course aspect will enhance the desired
attributes.