Intentional Learning: A Process for Learning to Learn in the Accounting Curriculum-Appendix C. Assessing Learning-to-Learn Skills

Intentional Learning: A Process for Learning to Learn in the Accounting Curriculum

PDF Version (for printing)

Resources on Change in Accounting Education

 

Appendix C
Assessing Learning-to-Learn
Skillsa

 

OBJECTIVE

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

MEASUREMENT INDICATORS

MEASUREMENT STRATEGIES

Questioning: Students actively and effectively use questions to advance their understanding of a subject

Students' questions require analysis, synthesis, application, integration, or evaluation of knowledge

Cognitive complexity of students' questions based on levels of Bloom's taxonomy or "levels-of-processing" theory

Rate students' questions in class discussion

Rate questions submitted by students in preparation for a major project

Organizing: Students effectively organize information for storage (retention) and subsequent retrieval

Students' organizing strategies accurately represent relationships among concepts. Students use a variety of organizing strategies for different purposes

Appropriateness and variety in students' use of organizing strategies (outlines, matrices, flow charts, diagrams, charts, graphs, etc.)

Rate organizational strategies in students' oral and written presentations

Connecting: Students actively link new concepts and principles to prior learning and experience

Student identify linkages that accurately reflect concepts and advance understanding of accounting situations

Ratings of quality, fluency, and appropriateness of linkages between concepts and prior learning or experiences

Rate key-word lists, concept maps, responses on paired concepts tests (quality of relationships identified for given pair of terms or phrases)

Reflecting: Students reflect on what they have learned and on their own learning process

Students demonstrate ability to extract lessons from experiences and to describe their own learning processes

Ratings of quality and appropriateness of reflective observations

Rate debriefing summaries from case discussions and simulations: rate comments in learning journals or self-assessments of strengths and weaknesses in performance on major projects

Adapting: Students use what they have learned to create new solutions to unstructured problems

Knowledge base is accurate and appropriate; solution proposals are plausible and inventive

Ratings of accuracy and appropriateness of knowledge application; ratings of solution effectiveness and inventiveness

Rate solutions to unstructured case studies, responses in simulations, project proposals, etc.

aGainen and Locatelli, p. 106.

Previous

Continued...

Back to Table of Contents