John J. Shon
University of Chicago
Abstract: I investigate the relation between earnings changes and discretionary disclosure behavior in an environment of heightened litigation risk. Because Rule 10b-5 lawsuits are rarely filed for firms with good equity returns, I select a sample of firms that experience negative equity returnsbut not necessarily negative earnings performance. Inconsistent with the litigation hypothesis, I find that negative earnings-change firms make fewer preemptive earnings disclosures. However, such firms provide more negative information content in non-earnings-related disclosures. Conversely, though prima facie positive earnings-change firms disclose similarly (in number and timeliness), they remain relatively silent with respect to the negative information content of the disclosures made. Results highlight the non-trivial difference that sample selection can have on inferences regarding disclosure behavior. Overall, in high-litigation environments, earnings and discretionary disclosures serve complementary roles, suggesting that firms may not supplement uninformative earnings with informative discretionary disclosureseven when faced with high expected litigation costs.
Back to Program