Jagan Krishnan K. Raghunandan Joon S. Yang Abstract: Policymakers have periodically expressed concerns about the possible adverse effects on auditor independence associated with lengthy auditor-client relationships. Some recent studies find that contrary to the fears expressed by legislators, auditors’ judgments are not less conservative for their long-tenured clients; these studies have examined voluntary switches by clients or auditors. In this paper, we focus on a setting that comes closest to the mandatory switches recommended by policymakers. The indictment of Arthur Andersen in 2002 led to an involuntary exodus of clients from Andersen. We examine going-concern opinions for former clients of Andersen, and compare them with opinions issued for other clients. We find some evidence that auditors were less likely to issue a going-concern modified audit opinion to clients who switched from Andersen than their existing clients. This finding does not support concerns that auditors would be more lenient to their long-tenured clients. |