|
Rules versus Principles Based Pension Accounting Standards: An Investigation of Comparability
Dr. Isabel Gordon,
University of Sydney
Professor Natalie Gallery, Queensland University of Technology
ABSTRACT. This paper investigates the comparability construct in the context of pension accounting. It is motivated by Schipper and Vincent’s (2003) comment that comparability is under-researched. In practice, compromises or rules introduced into pension accounting standards are not based on principles but result from political bargaining (Daley and Tranter, 1990). Current pension accounting standards in the USA, Australia and the international pension accounting standard are compared using a “theoretical” benchmark to present the economic substance of the transaction. To develop the theoretical benchmark, Barth and Clinch’s (1996) use of Ohlson’s (1989) clean surplus model is adapted to articulate the sponsor’s profit and loss and balance sheet so that compromises are highlighted. This paper concludes that a principles-based approach that emphasises the economic substance and clean surplus approach need not necessarily compromise comparability.
Full-Text is no longer available online. Please contact the author(s) for more information about this manuscript.
Back to Session Listing
|