Earnings Misstatements, Restatements and Corporate Governance

William Heninger, Brigham Young University
Yongtae Kim, Santa Clara University
Sandeep Nabar, Oklahoma State University

ABSTRACT. Unlike other studies that focus on either the misstatement or the restatement only, we examine changes in the governance characteristics of restating firms from the initial misstatement to the restatement to obtain insights into the changes that lead to the detection and correction of such misreporting. We find that prior to misstatements, misstating firms are more likely to have CEOs who sit on nominating committees, less independent boards of directors, and less independent audit committees, relative to control firms. Our results indicate that pre-misstatement agency conflicts are not resolved prior to restatements. Boards and audit committees continue to be relatively less independent at the time of the restatement. We also find that restating firms are more likely to experience CFO turnover. Based on the results, we conclude that the restatements, which constitute an admission and correction of accounting irregularities, are not attributable to governance improvements in firms.

Full-Text is no longer available online. Please contact the author(s) for more information about this manuscript.

Back to Session Listing