The Accounting Educator

The Newsletter of the Teaching and Curriculum Section
American Accounting Association
Vol. XII No. 2 – Winter 2003

Application of Problem-Based Learning
(PBL) in Accounting
Araya Debessay, University of Delaware

The Search for Innovative Pedagogical Approaches.

The call for introducing new pedagogical approaches has been persistent, loud, and clear. The American Accounting Association (Bedford Committee Report 1986), the Big 8 accounting firms (The White Paper, 1989), the Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC) 1994, and the AICPA, have all urged accounting educators to devise innovative educational reforms to equip accounting graduates with the skills and abilities necessary to meet the challenges of the ever growing and increasingly complex professional career.

The Bedford Report (1986, 187) recommends: "Faculties should design educational experiences for students that require them to be active, independent learners and problem solvers rather than passive recipients of information." There was also a similar call for reform in undergraduate education at the June 1994 Wingspread Conference that was organized to discuss the quality of undergraduate education. The conference developed the following list of important characteristic of quality performance of college and university graduates (Wingspread, 1994):

  • High-level skills in communication, computation, technological literacy, and information retrieval to enable individuals to gain and apply new knowledge and skills as needed.
  • The ability to arrive at informed judgments—that is, to effectively define problems, gather and evaluate information related to those problems, and develop solutions
  • Ability to address specific problems in complex, real-world settings, in which the development of workable solutions is required.

With the AECC's role as a catalyst for change, several schools have introduced curriculum and pedagogical changes, but there are also many others who are still relying on the traditional methods of teaching. Albrecht and Sack have lamented, "Except in a few schools, these warning signals—warnings about the future viability of accounting education—have largely gone unheeded. In too many respects, accounting education is being delivered the same way today as it was 20 or 30 years ago" (Albrecht and Sack, 2000, 2). This situation should not continue. It is incumbent upon accounting educators to explore ways that will prepare students better for the challenges of the 21st Century.

Accounting educators who are still relying on the traditional, lecture-based way of teaching are being "criticized for spending too much time on content mastery and too little time and effort to helping students to develop skills that will enrich their lives and make them successful" (Albrecht and Sack, 2000, 5). The concern with the traditional, lecture-based teaching is that students are primarily "engaged in rote learning, which entails the acquisition of facts that have little staying power" (Duch et al., 2001, 319). The Carnegie Foundation's report, Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities (1988) stated that "traditional lectures and note taking were created for a time when books were scarce and costly and lecturing to large numbers of students was an efficient means of transferring knowledge" (Duch et al., 2001, 5).

The persistent call is for pedagogical approaches that will help professionals develop their problem-solving skills, their analytical ability, and their ability for collaborative work as well the ability to continue to learn on their own. In urging accounting educators to devise new pedagogical approaches, Albrecht and Sack argue: "Students forget what they memorize. Content knowledge becomes dated and is often not transferable across different types of jobs. On the other hand, critical skills rarely become obsolete and are usually transferable across assignments and careers" (Albrecht and Sack, 2000, 55). In order to address the concerns raised by Albrecht and Sack, accounting educators need to "design educational experiences for students that require them to be active, independent learners and problem solvers rather than passive recipients of information" (Duch et al., 2001, 4)

The purpose of this writing is to urge accounting educators to seriously consider Problem-Based Learning (PBL) as a pedagogy that will better prepare accounting professionals for the challenges of the 21st Century.

What is Problem-Based Learning (PBL)?

PBL is a group-based active interactive and collaborative learning approach. PBL has its roots in the medical education. PBL, at the present, has achieved wide popularity in a variety of disciplines in undergraduate education. Core Competency Framework for Entry into the Accounting Profession (AICPA 2001) has listed PBL as one of the recommended "strategies and classroom techniques" for the development of requisite competencies for accounting professionals. The AICPA is urging Academics to embrace the "paradigm shift from a content-driven to a skills-based curriculum," by adopting PBL among other pedagogical approaches (see http://www.aicpa.org/edu/boardof.htm).

The unique feature of PBL is the fact that it is a problem driven, student-centered learning approach where the student assumes major responsibility in the learning process and the role of the instructor is that of a facilitator and a discussion leader (Schwartz et al. 2). While there are different versions of what constitutes PBL, it is not the same as problem-solving activities that are typically found in accounting textbooks. "In the problem-based approach, complex, real-world problems are used to motivate students to identify and research the concepts and principles they need to know to work through those problems." (Boud and Feletti, 1997, 2).

Cottell (2002) has developed several accounting cases for application of PBL in accounting. In explaining the difference between PBL cases and the problems in traditional accounting textbooks, Cottell states that unlike the traditional textbook accounting problems, a PBL case is "an unfolding problem...in that the problem itself does not contain sufficient information for the student to solve it. In the initial stage, the problem has a vague and broad requirement. As students wrestle with the problem, they first must determine what information they must obtain to fulfill the requirement. The problem 'unfolds' as students are given additional information that allows them to engage the problem at an increasingly concrete level. As the students work together on the several stages of the problem, they simultaneously learn both course-related concepts and problem-solving skills " (Cottell, 2002).

The History of PBL

PBL was first introduced at McMaster Medical School in Canada in the late 1960s (Schwartz et al., 2001, 2). Since then, PBL is being widely used in a variety of disciplines with some variations. One of the originators of PBL, H.S. Barrows, has said that PBL "does not refer to a specific educational method. It can have many different meanings" (Barrows, 1986, quoted in Schwartz et al., 2001, 2). Since the early 1990's, The University of Delaware has promoted Problem-Based Learning in several disciplines and has achieved an international recognition in the use of problem-based and active-learning strategies in the classroom. The University of Delaware has created a Clearinghouse, which is believed to be the first online PBL journal. Several accounting cases that have been specifically developed for use in PBL environment are available to accounting educators through the University of Delaware PBL Clearinghouse. (https://www.mis4.udel.edu/Pbl/)

The Benefits of PBL

The motivation to adopt PBL in the medical education was the desire to help medical professionals to cope up with explosion of knowledge that proved the traditional rote learning seriously deficient (Evensen and Hmelo, 2000, 1). Given that accounting professionals are facing similar problems, PBL, which has proven effective in the medical profession, can also be successfully applied in educating accounting professionals. One of the compelling reasons why accounting educators should adopt PBL is because it is becoming increasingly clear that it is difficult to include all the knowledge that the accounting professionals will need to prepare them for their professional career. Moreover, it is a waste of valuable time to expect accounting students to learn material that in many instances proves obsolete before they graduate. What is needed in educating accounting professionals is to help them acquire the skills that will enable them to "learn quickly, effectively and independently when they need it" (Boud and Feletti, 1997, 4).

Problem-based instruction is designed to help students develop the following abilities:

  • Think critically and be able to analyze and solve complex, real-world problems
  • Find, evaluate, and use appropriate learning resources Ø Work cooperatively in teams and small groups
  • Demonstrate versatile and effective communication skill, both verbal and written (Albanese and Mitchell 1993, quoted in Duch et al., 2001).

To sum up, the benefit of PBL is to help accounting students to develop the ability for self-directed learning in order to cope with ever changing and increasing body of knowledge they will need to succeed as professionals. (Boud and Feletti 1997, 17)

References

Albrecht, W. S. and R. J. Sack. 2000. Accounting Education: Charting the Course through a Perilous Future, Accounting Education Series, Volume No. 16. Sarasota, Florida: American Accounting Association.

American Accounting Association (AAA), Bedford Committee, Committee on the Future Structure, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education (The Bedford Committee). 1986. "Future Accounting Education: Preparing for the expanding profession." Issues in Accounting Education (Spring): 168–195.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2001. Core Competency Framework for Entry into the Accounting Profession. Available at: http://www.aicpa.org/edu/boardof.htm.

Boud, D. and G. Feletti, G., eds. 1997. The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning. Second edition. London, U.K.: Kogan Page

Cottell, P. 2002. Blankley Corporation Case. PBL Clearinghouse, University of Delaware. Available through: https://www.mis4.udel.edu/Pbl/.

Duch, B. J., S. E. Groh, and D. E. Allen, eds. 2001. The Power of Problem-Based Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Evensen D. H. and C. E. Hmelo, eds. 2000. Problem-Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Perspectives on Education: Capabilities for Success in the Accounting Profession (The White Paper). 1989. Arthur Andersen & Co., Arthur Young, Coopers & Lybrand, Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Ernst & Whinney, Peat Marwick Main & Co., Price Waterhouse, and Touche Ross. New York, NY.

Savin-Baden, M. 2000. Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: Untold Stories. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.

Schwartz, P., S. Mennin , and G. Webb, eds. 2001. Problem-Based Learning: Case Studies, Experience and Practice. London, U.K.: Kogan Page.

Wilerson, L., and W. H. Gijselaers, eds. 1996. Bringing Problem-Based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass Publishers.

Williams, D. Z. and G. L. Sundem. 1991. "Grant Awarded for Implementing Improvements in Accounting Education," Issues in Accounting Education, 5(2), 325–328


Araya Debessay, Professor of Accounting, Department of Accounting and MIS, at the University of Delaware, is currently serving as the Chair of the Pedgagogy Committee of the Teaching and Curriculum (T&C) Section of the AAA. Professor Debessay is an Advanced Fellow of the Institute to Transform Undergraduate Education (ITUE) at the University of Delaware. The University of Delaware has promoted Problem-Based Learning in several disciplines and has achieved an international recognition in the use of problem-based and active-learning strategies in the classroom. Professor Debessay has used Group-Based Active Interactive and Collaborative Learning Approach in his accounting classes. As an Advanced Fellow of ITUE, he is trained in the application of PBL and has used PBL in his Intermediate Accounting course. He has also served as a reviewer of PBL cases in Accounting for the University of Delaware based PBL Clearinghouse.


Return to the Table of Contents