Auditing Section
American Accounting Association
Auditing Section

Minutes of the Executive Committee

August 15-17, 1999


January 15, 1999 - Executive Committee Meeting
January 17, 1999 – Executive Committee Meeting


Executive Committee Meeting

Minutes of the Meeting of the Executive Committee
Auditing Section
American Accounting Association
August 15, 1999


San Diego, California


Present: Mark Beasley, Jean C. Bedard, Tim Bell, Stan Biggs, Barry Cushing, Jack Krogstad, Karen Pincus, Joe Carcello, Jack Robertson, Jerry Sullivan.

Guests: Peter Gillett (Chair, Auditing Standards Committee), Arnie Wright (Editor, AJPT), Gary Braun (Editor, The Auditor’s Report), Mark Taylor (Associate Editor, The Auditor’s Report), Faye Borthick (Chair, Communications Committee), Bill Dilla (Chair, CPE Committee), Bev Harrelson (AAA)

The meeting was called to order at 8:30 by Tim Bell, President. Tim welcomed Stan Biggs, the incoming Vice President-Academic, Mark Beasley, the incoming Treasurer, and Jack Robertson, the incoming Historian.



Maintenance of Operating Manual and By-laws

Jack Krogstad proposed editorial changes to the by-laws. The Committee discussed procedures for maintaining the by-laws and operating manual.

Action
Bell, Pincus, Robertson

Tim will have his office prepare a new electronic version of both documents, incorporating the editorial changes suggested by Jack Krogstad. Karen and Jack Robertson will work to define the role of the historian in the electronic environment.



Outstanding Educator Award

Tim Bell circulated the Outstanding Auditing Educator Award Committee’s recommendations to the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee selected Nick Dopuch to receive the award at the Year 2000 Midyear Meeting of the Auditing Section.



Outstanding Dissertation Award

Karen Pincus reported that the Nominations Committee has selected Jay Rich of the University of Connecticut as this year’s winner. Ira Solomon of the University of Illinois is his dissertation chair.

Action
Pincus
The Committee discussed the issue of candidates for the award who have dissertations producing multiple papers. It was agreed that the policy should be clarified to ensure that only one paper is received from each individual. In order to accomplish this clarification, the word "single" is to be inserted between "a" and "paper" in future calls for nominations.



Proposal for Section sponsorship of the International Symposium on Audit Research

The Committee discussed the application for Section sponsorship of the 2000 International Symposium on Audit Research. Factors noted in favor of the application were: (1) there will be no cost to Section, (2) the Symposium organizers have extensive research records and editorial experience; and (3) past USC/ISAR conferences have a history of presenting high quality papers. Some concern was voiced among Executive Committee members about the editorial process contained in the proposal, particularly that the selection of all referees was not under the control of the Editor of AJPT. Further, the proposal notes that publication of discussant comments in the AJPT Conference Supplement is not planned, which is a departure from the usual practice for Section-sponsored conferences.

Joe Carcello moved, and Jean Bedard seconded, that the Committee approve sponsorship of the 2000 ISAR subject to the current Editor of the journal having final authority over selection of referees, and also subject to the execution of a satisfactory letter of agreement with the host institution. Noting that the elimination of published discussant comments from the supplemental issue is a change from prior co-sponsorship agreements, we request that the Editor report back to the XC at the Midyear 2001 meeting with regard to the advisability of continuing this approach. The motion carried by a vote of six in favor, zero against.



Auditing Standards Committee

Jerry Sullivan noted that at the Midyear 1999 meeting of the Executive Committee, we had discussed the disconnect between academia and practice. In the interim, he brought this matter to individuals at the Auditing Standards Board, the Independence Standards Board, the SEC Practice Section, and the Professional Ethics Division. Based on this input, his staff has put together a listing of all projects currently under consideration by these entities, which could benefit from academic comment. A 17-page report outlining these projects was distributed to the Committee. Jerry reported that the standards setters were very interested in the availability of the compilation, and also in the possibility of greater involvement by individuals with research expertise. The Committee thanked Jerry for his effort in initiating this report, and noted the great potential for research/practice interaction that it contains. Means of dissemination of the report were discussed, and it was decided to maintain the latest version of the report on the AICPA’s web site, to provide a link to the report from the Auditing Section’s web site, and to regularly notify members of its presence and content. (See action item following report of the ASC Chair.)



Report of Peter Gillett (Chair, Auditing Standards Committee)

Peter presented the ASC’s report, which was not delivered at the 1999 Midyear Meeting due to travel difficulties. The ASC proposes to develop academic responses to a selected number of proposed auditing standards, and to publish these responses in an appropriate outlet, such as AJPT or Accounting Horizons. The Executive Committee discussed the ASC proposal, and decided that the most appropriate outlet for comments on proposed auditing standards written by the ASC is the newsletter, not a journal. Further, the report on auditing standards in process prepared by Jerry Sullivan provides a new means for the ASC to facilitate researcher/practice alliances on topics of mutual interest. The following plan was devised:

Action
Bell, Sullivan, Gillett

Tim Bell will call Peter Gillett and request that Jerry Sullivan attend their meeting on August 16. At that time, Jerry will provide the ASC with the standards report and seek their input on how best to utilize it to increase the input of researchers to the standard-setting process. The Executive Committee requests that the ASC revise its charge in light of the report, and present a new proposal as to how to move forward with this information.

Action
Adair, Sullivan

The Webmaster, Lyn Adair, will be responsible for establishing a link to the report on the AICPA’s web site. Jerry Sullivan will update the report on the AICPA site quarterly.

Action
Sullivan, Braun

In order to notify members about this important resource, a short article should be prepared for the Fall newsletter. This article should introduce members to the report and tell them how to proceed if they want to provide input to any particular standard.



Report of Faye Borthick (Chair, Communications Committee)

Faye reported that the Communications Committee had sent a sample of AJPT articles to a commercial entity that turned them into PDF and HTML files. She reported that people prefer HTML because it is more usable (e.g., the files are searchable). She noted that we would probably want both for publication of journal articles. The Communication Committee’s recommendation is to proceed as quickly as we can to make AJPT available electronically. The cost to convert the sample of articles was $200 (less than one journal issue), but this may not represent the ongoing price. AAA may be in the conversion business as well, and if so, it is a good path to work with AAA rather than outsourcing. Tim Bell thanked Faye for her good service as Chair.



Gary Braun (Editor, The Auditor’s Report)

Gary provided an update of his research on the issue of advertising in the newsletter. The AAA has no objection, and they have a process in place to give information to potential advertisers. Craig has been asked to include us in solicitations, but Gary has not had any contact regarding potential advertisers.

Action
Bell
Tim will issue a formal solicitation to AAA for inclusion of The Auditor’s Report in advertising solicitations, also discuss revenue sharing arrangements and the possibility of an internet model.



Arnie Wright (Editor, AJPT)

Arnie reported on his first few weeks as Editor. He is dealing with 20 Waterloo submissions, eight new submissions, and seven revise and resubmits. He has purchased new editorial software to be Y2K compliant. As much as possible, all reviewing is being handled electronically, and this is working well. New initiatives include appointment of Associate Editors (Jane Mutchler and Ken Trotman), and inclusion of a practice summary along with any article published. Arnie has contacted the Editor of the Journal of Accountancy, who is interested but wants to view some examples before making a commitment. Jack Krogstad suggested that Internal Auditor may also be interested. Arnie brought to the Committee’s attention the differential submission fee for international members ($100 versus $50 domestic), and noted that given electronic submission, it is difficult to justify a differential charge. Other section journals charge $75 for all submissions, which is justified given the increased costs of producing the journal.

Karen Pincus moved and Barry Cushing seconded that we charge $75 to all members for submission fees to AJPT, effective January 1, 2000. 6 in favor, none against.

Arnie also reported transition procedures from Bill Felix’s editorship. In order to avoid rushing the process for articles still outstanding at the transition, Bill passed these articles on to Arnie for final decision. In the transition issue, the Editor accepting each article will be noted.

Arnie also brought to the Executive Committee issues relating to articles in AJPT appearing in computerized databases.

Action
Pincus, Beasley

Karen and Mark agreed to follow up with AAA to gain an understanding of the organization’s agreement with ProQuest.

Action
Wright
The Executive Committee requests that Arnie contact the Editor of Internal Auditor regarding the possibility of publishing practice summaries of AJPT articles in that journal. Also, Arnie should consider publishing reviewing histories of each article (i.e., dates of each submission and acceptance dates).



Bill Dilla (Chair, CPE Committee)

Bill reported that 50 participants attended the CPE session sponsored by KPMG at the 1999 Midyear meeting, and many were turned away. At this Annual meeting, two courses are being delivered: asynchronous learning on internet (16 registrants) and synchronous learning (9 registrants). In terms of ongoing problems, he reports continued difficulties in coordination with regional meetings. However, coordination with AAA is improving with the emergence of a faculty development committee that will coordinate with the sections. Bill is a member of that committee and Jane Mutchler is Chair.

Regarding priorities, Bill notes that the emphasis has been on education-related CPE courses, and asks if the Section would like to sponsor more research-oriented CPE. For instance, presenters at the Doctoral Consortium, might consider repeating their presentations in a CPE session.



Beverly Harrelson (AAA)

Beverly reported on AAA activities regarding web site design and maintenance. The AAA is pleased to be able to help us design our site. Although the site is now hosted at Rutgers, it may in the future be moved to the AAA’s new in-house server to facilitate ties between meeting registration and membership lists.

Beverly also discussed electronic production of journals. Access to the secure site for journals is password-protected, and is elective for a $20 fee for the three AAA non-Section journals. In addition, if the Section wants AJPT in a similar arrangement, the Section would pay AAA $5 for each person who signs up for electronic access to the journal.



Joe Carcello (Treasurer),1998-99 Budget Review

Joe provided up-to-date figures for the current year budget. He noted that continuing sources of revenue are likely to be lower than continuing expenses. Sources of the problem are:

  1. $5000 increase in support for editorial costs of AJPT;
  2. AAA is charging the sections an incremental overhead amount of $6500 beyond previous year costs;
  3. royalty fees are down.
Regarding the last item, Joe asked Roland LaTulip why payments have declined from last year. His response was that payments are inconsistent, and there is no way we can audit these amounts.

The Committee agreed that further investigation is necessary, as these amounts are substantial.

Action
Beasley

Mark will follow up with AAA and with the Copyright Clearing House to investigate how the royalty payments are computed.

Given the decline in the Section’s cash balance and the increase in costs that is likely to continue, the Committee also discussed the possibility of a future increase in Section dues. Karen Pincus noted that other Sections have higher dues. Research into the Section’s operating manual by Jack Krogstad revealed that the Section has not had a dues increase since 1982, and that the dues are capped at $15 by the by-laws. Given that the by-laws also stipulate that changes in the dues must be approved by Section membership, maintaining the cap in the by-laws seems illogical. The Committee decided to include a change in the by-laws to remove the dues cap, along with other recommended changes.

Action
All members, Robertson, Bell, Braun, Adair


All members should examine the editorial changes in the by-laws and the operating manual suggested by Jack Krogstad (along with the proposal to remove the dues cap), and communicate any exceptions to the proposed changes to Jack Robertson by September 1. The entire text with proposed amendments will be placed on the web site. The major points will be summarized in newsletter, referring to web site and noting that members can write for a hard copy to Tim Bell’s office.



Update: 2000 Midyear Meeting and Doctoral Consortium

Karen Pincus reported that KPMG has generously agreed to support the costs of the Doctoral Consortium before the 2000 Midyear Meeting. The students’ costs of hotel, meals, meeting registration, etc., will be covered. RFP’s have been sent to potential sites in Houston and Orlando for the 2001 meeting.

Action
Pincus
Announcements of the Consortium will be made at the Section’s luncheon, in an email, and letters to doctoral program chairs.



Update: Key Performance Measures

Jean Bedard distributed a report on Key Performance Indicators, collected as part of the Strategic Planning Process. She noted that several officers had not responded to requests for data. A compilation of data on Section activities at meetings was included in the report. The issue of Section input into the Regional Meeting programs of some Regions (i.e., Mid-Atlantic and Ohio) was again discussed. Further discussion of the report was postponed until Tuesday’s meeting.


The meeting was adjourned at 3:30 PM.


Minutes of the Meeting of the Executive Committee
Auditing Section
American Accounting Association
August 17, 1999

San Diego, California

Present: Jean C. Bedard, Stan Biggs, Tim Bell, Karen Pincus, Mark Beasley

The meeting was called to order at 7:30 AM by Karen Pincus, President. Karen welcomed Stan Biggs, incoming Vice-President-Academic and President-Elect, Mark Beasley, incoming Treasurer, and Jack Robertson, incoming Historian. She extended thanks to Tim Bell for his guidance during her term as President-Elect.

Karen then reported on the Section’s committee structure and on her appointments for the upcoming year. She noted that due to the Section’s three-year appointments, some members might not realize they are still members of a committee after a year or two. To ensure that all committee members are up to date, Karen sent reappointment letters to each to remind them of their assignments.



Academic Standards Committee

The Executive Committee discussed the additional responsibilities that will be undertaken by the ASC in their new role as facilitators of research/practice interaction on the standards-setting process, based on Jerry Sullivan’s report. (See minutes of the 8/15/99 Executive Committee meeting.)

Action
Pincus

It was decided to add a Vice-Chair who will normally become Chair in the next year, and Past Chair in the following year. This system is similar to that used for other offices in the Section, e.g., the newsletter Editor, Midyear and Annual Meeting coordinator positions. The Vice-Chair will assist the Chair in managing the communication necessary to fulfill this important responsibility. Also, due to increased work load and need to interact with the practice community, the XC liaison for the ASC will be the VP-Practice.



Communications

Action
Pincus
This committee’s charge will be rewritten as a result of the addition of web site responsibilities. Lyn Adair (Webmaster), Arnie Wright (Editor, AJPT) and Gary Braun (Editor, The Auditor’s Report) will be added as ex officio members, in order that they be included in the Committee’s deliberations and actions.



CPE

Karen recognized the good work performed by Bill Dilla over his term as Chair of this committee.



DSA

This committee has received several nominees for the 2000 award, and is in the process of making its selection.



Membership

Karen reported that this is a difficult committee to fill, due to its current structure (one member from each region). Tim Bell circulated a report from Mary Christ outlining the current status of the Section’s membership. Also, Tim reported a follow-up on last year’s vote by the Executive to compile a list of leaders from practice to receive Section materials, including the newsletter and journal. Jerry Sullivan is compiling list and Mary Christ has prepared a rough draft of an invitation letter.

Action
Pincus

Tim noted that this effort to add leaders from practice to the mailing list should be added to the Committee’s charge, and that someone will have to maintain the list.

Jean Bedard reported that she has been receiving membership lists, and was not aware that the Membership Committee chair was not also receiving this information.

Action
Bedard


It was decided that the membership lists should continue to go to the Section’s Secretary, and that the Secretary should then send them on to the Membership Committee Chair as well as to the Historian.

Stan Biggs asked whether the Membership Committee has some ideas about how to increase the Section’s membership. Karen noted that a lot of good ideas had been generated from past committees. Tim Bell reported that much of the downward trend is due to retirement.



Midyear Meeting

Action
Biggs, Pincus
Karen asked Stan Biggs to work with Linda McDaniel to fill out this Committee with members so that Linda can have a full group. Assuming that the Doctoral Consortium at the 2000 Midyear is a success, there is a committee structure specified in the proposal that will be continued in the future. To facilitate coordination, Karen will add the CPE Director and the Chair of the Doctoral Consortium Committee to the Midyear Meeting committee.

The Executive Committee also discussed the role of Midyear Meeting program committee in site selection. Karen and Tim noted that the AAA wants to assist the Sections in this task, and that the key is to fill in the AAA’s list of criteria completely.

Action
Biggs
Stan will try to formalize a list of criteria that Midyear Meeting committees can use in the future.



Regional Chairs
The problems associated with variation in the role of Regional Chairs were again discussed.



Notable Contributions
Karen reported that there were few nominations for this award.

Action
Cushing

Barry Cushing will work on ways to improve the nominations process. According to its charge, the Committee may widen the list of nominees.



Nominations
Karen noted that currently this Committee is selected from the Regional Chairs. This advisability of this method should be revisited, as it limits the pool of members from which to select for the important task of nominating the Section’s officers.

Action
Biggs
Stan Biggs will add to the Executive Committee’s agenda for the 2000 Midyear Meeting the issue of selection of this Committee from the Regional Chairs.



Liaison system
Karen reported that liaisons will have difficulty monitoring committee activities unless the liaison has a relationship with the committee. She has talked to all committee chairs about setting goals for the upcoming year, but sent only general charges to them.

Action
All members
Karen suggests that after this meeting, Executive Committee members contact their respective committees to work on development of specific goals. Also, more frequent reporting deadlines will be set (i.e., three reporting periods per year).



Study of three-year appointments
Karen recently asked members of the Section’s committees for their views on the pros and cons of three-year appointments. She distributed a report containing their views and suggestions. Those responding favored the three-year system by a wide margin, over shorter appointments. Members also provided useful suggestions for wording of appointment letters and possible formal evaluation of committee members.



Practice Advisory Council
Karen stressed the importance of the PAC to the Section, and the Executive Committee ways to express our appreciation to, and approve linkage with, the PAC.

Action
Pincus, Powell

The consensus of the Executive Committee was to ask Karen and Tom Powell to work on a new model of interaction with the PAC.



Key dates:
Karen will distribute a list of key dates for the upcoming year.

The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 AM.


Auditing Section Home Page

The Webmaster

September 30, 1999