The Auditors Report

ASB Update as of May 15, 2002

Ray Whittington, DePaul University
Academic Member of the Auditing Standards Board

In this update, I will focus on the ASB's efforts to update its strategic plan. As always, please contact me if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions.

Horizons II
In December 1997, the ASB issued a strategic plan, Horizons for the Auditing Standards Board, that set forth its operational plans for the next three to five years. Much has occurred in the auditing profession since the issuance of that document. At its March 20, 2002 meeting, the Audit Issues Task Force decided to form a task force to develop the ASB's strategic plan for the next 5 years. The project, which tentatively has been labeled Horizons II, should be completed over the next 9 months.

In developing Horizons II, representatives of the task force will be interviewing various stakeholders to get input to determine the issues that should be addressed by the ASB over this intermediate term. I will be responsible for getting input from the academic community. In the remainder of this update I will focus on issues that the task force has initially identified as potential candidates.

Auditing Accounting Disclosures
Auditing standards do not currently distinguish between the extent of the evidence that should be obtained about amounts included in the basic financial statements vs. information and amounts included in financial statement disclosures. The ASB may add to its agenda a project that would address whether there should be a difference and, if so, the basis for that difference.

Technology
The ASB continues to be concerned that auditing standards do not adequately address the risks and other implications of new technology. Thus, a project with the objective of providing more guidance on effects of technology on audits of financial statements is being considered. The guidance may not be SAS level but, instead, might take the form of an audit guide or tool kit.

Outsourcing
SAS No. 70, Service Organizations, provides guidance on the factors an independent auditor should consider when auditing financial statements of an entity that uses a service organization to process certain transactions. There is no guidance in the auditing literature for situations in which the entity outsources other business processes. For example, a number of entities have outsourced their entire accounting function. This possible agenda item would involve developing guidance on the effect of such outsourcing arrangements on the audit of financial statements.

Harmonization of Auditing Standards
Most individuals in the profession agree that harmonization of U.S. and international auditing standards is desirable. However, there are a number of ways in which this objective might be achieved. Several examples are enumerated below:

  • Develop SASs that do not depart significantly from those of the International Federation of Accountant's International Auditing Standards (ISAs)
  • Adopt ISAs in total and supplement them with SASs for matters that are particular to the U.S.
  • Adopt ISAs modified to include requirements that are in SASs that are not currently included in the ISAs

The issue of harmonization also brings into question the role of the ASB after harmonization is substantially achieved. The ASB is looking for insight into the appropriate way to move towards harmonization of auditing standards.

Education and Experience of Auditors
Currently, auditing standards view the auditor as proficient in accounting and auditing. Given advances in technology and the complexity of business models and accounting standards, the ASB is questioning whether auditing standards set the appropriate bar with respect to the auditor expertise. Therefore consideration is being given to the need to readdress the skills and competencies needed to audit financial statements.

Other Issues
The ASB has identified a number of other issues that might be included in the strategic plan. These include:

  1. Auditing assets, liabilities and exchange transactions valued at fair value;
  2. Auditing measurements and disclosures that require assumptions about future events;
  3. Continuous auditing, including the appropriate definition of the phrase;
  4. Enhancing public confidence in the audit;
  5. Analytical commentary by the auditor to assist users evaluate the financial statements;
  6. Assurance about other information in the report on the audit of financial statements, such as management's discussion and analysis, internal control, or compliance with laws and regulations;

Please provide me with any input you might have regarding these matters or others that you believe should be considered in the ASB's strategic planning process.


Back to Contents Page