COSO Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
The scenario is equally applicable to all types of entities. However, due to the nature of some entities, certain principles, such as Principle 2, Exercises Oversight Responsibility, may be different in, for example, a governmental entity.
Principle Evaluation—Control Environment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Principle 1: Demonstrates Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values —The organization demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values. | ||||
Points of Focus
| ||||
Summary of Controls to Effect Principle 1 | ||||
The board of directors and senior management have formulated a set of policies on integrity and ethics, and these policies are regularly flashed on the firm's internal portal and in newsletters, as well as being incorporated into the contracts with outsourced service providers. It is up to the management of each operating unit to evaluate adherence to the organization's integrity and ethics policies. In most cases, this is not conducted. It is up to the management of each operating unit to identify and address deviations against the organization's integrity and ethics policies. Normally, this occurs only when management is specifically made aware of a situation. | ||||
Deficiencies Applicable to Principle 1 | ||||
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate preliminary deficiency severity: (Consider whether other controls to effect this principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Preliminary Severity—Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
CE 1-1 | There is no formal training program to help make employees aware of the importance of adherence to the standards of conduct. | N fn 5 | N/A | |
CE 1-2 | The company does not have processes in place to evaluate individuals against the published integrity and ethics policy. | N fn 5 | N/A | |
CE 1-3 | Processes to identify and address deviations are ad hoc in the organization. | N fn 5 | N/A | |
Evaluate deficiencies within the principle:* Evaluate if any internal control deficiencies or combination of internal control deficiencies, when considered within the principle, represent a major deficiency.** <Update Summary of Deficiencies Template as required> | The combination of the internal control deficiencies noted in Principle 1 (CE 1-1, CE1-2, and CE 1-3) result in reclassifying all three as major deficiencies. While there are formally published and communicated ethics and compliance policies, without training to make people aware of the policies, and processes to evaluate individuals against deviations and identify and address deviations, the organization is not setting a tone that clearly communicates the message that violating the policies is unacceptable. | |||
Evaluate the principle using judgment.** | Y/N | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
Is the principle present? | N | Due to the major deficiency in the principle, the principle is not present. | ||
Is the principle functioning? | N | As the principle was not present, it is also not functioning. | ||
* Note: Record deficiencies in Summary of Deficiencies Template. ** If it is determined that there is a major deficiency, management must conclude that the principle is not present and functioning and the system of internal control is not effective. | ||||
Principle 2: Exercises Oversight Responsibility —The board of directors demonstrates independence from management and exercises oversight of the development and performance of internal control. | ||||
Points of Focus
| ||||
Summary of Controls to Effect Principle 2 The board of directors has a charter that is comprehensive and outlines the board's oversight responsibilities in a manner consistent with the entity's regulatory environment and expectations. The charter for the board clearly establishes the need for integrity and ethical values and outlines the organizational structure from the top down along with requirements for integrity, ethics, competence, and accountability at each level. The charter indicates that the board should review management's assessment of risk; however, the details of this review are not formally documented. The board consists of family members and a number of business professionals with significant experience. The managing director has considerable experience in running large businesses. There are a number of board members who come from outside organizations and who have a variety of experience. The board of directors has delegated certain responsibilities to its committees, and each committee has a well-defined charter delineating its responsibilities in the context of the entity's regulatory environment and expectations. The board reviewed the proposed summary of control activities and provided its feedback and guidance. The summary list of control activities and the internal control plan is presented annually by the compliance director. The executive committee regularly reports on the progress of the organization and the achievement of its internal financial reporting objectives. Every deficiency is analyzed by management and a corresponding remediation plan is provided to the board. However, the board does not formally document its review of the closure of the remediation activities. | ||||
Deficiencies Applicable to Principle 2 | ||||
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate preliminary deficiency severity: (Consider whether other controls to effect this principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Preliminary Severity—Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
CE 2-1 | While the charter indicates that the board should review management's assessment of risk, the details of this review are not formally documented. | N | This is primarily a documentation issue—the board does review the risk assessment as evidenced in the board minutes. | |
CE 2-2 | The board does not formally document its review of remediation plans and monitoring activities. | N | The remediation plans for deficiencies are reviewed by the board but not formally documented. Compensating control:The remediation activity and its completion are monitored by operational management. | |
Evaluate deficiencies within the principle:* Evaluate if any internal control deficiencies or combination of internal control deficiencies, when considered within the principle, represent a major deficiency.** <Update Summary of Deficiencies Template as required> | The internal control deficiencies noted in Principle 2 are minor or compensated for by other controls (see comments in deficiencies CE 2-1 and CE 2-2). These deficiencies do not represent a major deficiency. | |||
Evaluate the principle using judgment** | Y/N | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
Is the principle present? | Y | Internal control deficiencies noted were not considered severe enough to be major or have compensating controls. See comments in deficiencies CE 2-1 and CE 2-2. | ||
Is the principle functioning? | Y | Internal control deficiencies noted were not considered severe enoughto be major or have compensating controls. See comments in deficiencies CE 2-1 and CE 2-2. | ||
* Note: Record deficiencies in Summary of Deficiencies Template. ** If it is determined that there is a major deficiency, management must conclude that the principle is not present and functioning and the system of internal control is not effective. | ||||
Principle 3: Establishes Structure, Authority, and Responsibility —Management establishes, with board oversight, structures, reporting lines, and appropriate authorities and responsibilities in the pursuit of objectives. | ||||
Points of Focus
| ||||
Summary of Controls to Effect Principle 3 The design of the internal control system and the internal financial reporting objectives are discussed at the board meetings. The internal control organization design is evaluated jointly by both the board and management. The reporting and related governance structure is designed through consultation with the governance committee constituted by a competent senior management team. The governance committee works with the controller to ensure that responsibilities are clearly defined and the controls around segregation of duties are adequately designed. | ||||
Deficiencies Applicable to Principle 3 | ||||
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate preliminary deficiency severity: (Consider whether other controls to effect this principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Preliminary Severity—Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
CE 3-1 | Management has defined and the board of directors has signed off on the company's structures, reporting lines, and authorities and responsibilities; however, the business model has since evolved to encompass business partners, outsourced service providers, and new product lines so that new or are needed. Internal control weaknesses relating to this new dimension of the business could therefore be missed and cause the company to fall short of meeting its internal financial reporting objectives. | N | This internal control deficiency is important, but does not rise to the level of a major deficiency. Currently, the business structure changes affect a relatively small portion of the entity. | |
Evaluate deficiencies within the principle:* Evaluate if any internal control deficiencies or combination of internal control deficiencies, when considered within the principle, represent a major deficiency** <Update Summary of Deficiencies Template as required> | In a preliminary analysis, it has been determined that the severity of the internal control deficiency noted in Principle 3 (CE 3-1), though important, did not rise to the level of a major deficiency. | |||
Evaluate the principle using judgment** | Y/N | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
Is the principle present? | Y | |||
Is the principle functioning? | Y | |||
* Note: Record deficiencies in Summary of Deficiencies Template. ** If it is determined that there is a major deficiency, management must conclude that the principle is not present and functioning and the system of internal control is not effective. | ||||
Principle 4: Demonstrates Commitment to Competence —The organization demonstrates a commitment to attract, develop, and retain competent individuals in alignment with objectives. | ||||
Points of Focus
| ||||
Summary of Controls to Effect Principle 4 The competency framework is embedded into the policies and procedures of the organization. Specifically, there are sections of the policies and procedures that focus on the capabilities required at each level to effectively execute the controls around financial reporting. The internal control team evaluates and reports on the competency of the organization as well as the outsourced service providers. These reports are evaluated and gaps addressed by the management and the board. The organization has a robust training and mentoring framework to guide and support individuals and service providers on the organization's policies and procedures. | ||||
Deficiencies Applicable to Principle 4 | ||||
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate preliminary deficiency severity: (Consider whether other controls to effect this principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Preliminary Severity—Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Evaluate deficiencies within the principle:* Evaluate if any internal control deficiencies or combination of internal control deficiencies, when considered within the principle, represent a major deficiency** <Update Summary of Deficiencies Template as required> | No internal control deficiencies noted. | |||
Evaluate the principle using judgment** | Y/N | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
Is the principle present? | Y | No internal control deficencies noted. | ||
Is the principle functioning? | Y | No internal control deficencies noted. | ||
* Note: Record deficiencies in Summary of Deficiencies Template. ** If it is determined that there is a major deficiency, management must conclude that the principle is not present and functioning and the system of internal control is not effective. | ||||
Principle 5: Enforces Accountability —The organization holds individuals accountable for their internal control responsibilities in the pursuit of objectives. | ||||
Points of Focus
| ||||
Summary of Controls to Effect Principle 5 There are clear responsibilities within the organizational structure related to the execution of controls supporting the internal financial reporting objective. These responsibilities are annually reviewed by the board. The responsibility and related organizational structure is tied to a transparent evaluation framework that incorporates good practices, which encourages desirable and responsible behavior. There is a top-down performance reward system that is tied to internal control responsibilities for most personnel. The board evaluates the performance of the management team through discussions and reviews rather than just tracking numerical metrics. Performance is reviewed against established internal control goals and responsibilities established at the beginning of the year. There is also a review of the internal control organization and issues are traced to the individuals and teams responsible. Appropriate rewards and/or enforcement actions are exercised. This is reviewed quarterly by the board. | ||||
Deficiencies Applicable to Principle 5 | ||||
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate preliminary deficiency severity: Consider whether other controls to effect this principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Preliminary Severity—Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
CE 5-1 | The compensation structure for senior management is heavily weighted toward sales incentive bonuses as compared to salary. This may contribute to excessive pressure to meet business targets and produce favorable internal financial reports. | Y | There is no evidence that any consideration has been given to the pressures that may result or mitigating controls in place. | The incentive compensation puts pressure on senior management to act unethically. The major deficiencies in Principle 1 (CE 1-1, CE 1-2, and CE 1-3) do not set a tone that unethical behavior is unacceptable in the organization. |
Evaluate deficiencies within the principle:* Evaluate if any internal control deficiencies or combination of internal control deficiencies, when considered within the principle, represent a major deficiency.** <Update Summary of Deficiencies Template as required> | The internal control deficiency noted in the principle (CE 5-1) is a major deficiency. | |||
Evaluate the principle using judgment.** | Y/N | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
Is the principle present? | N | Due to the major deficiency (CE 5-1) in the principle, the principle is not present. | ||
Is the principle functioning? | N | As the principle was not present, it is also not functioning. | ||
* Note: Record deficiencies in Summary of Deficiencies Template. ** If it is determined that there is a major deficiency, management must conclude that the principle is not present and functioning and the system of internal control is not effective. | ||||
Present? (Y/N) | Functioning? (Y/N) | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
1. Demonstrates Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values—The organization demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values. | N | N | The appropriate tone at the top is not being set without a formal training program in place and there are no processes to identify and enforce adherence to the integrity and ethics policies (see deficiencies CE 1-1, CE 1-2, and CE 1-3). | |
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate internal control deficiency severity: Consider whether the controls to effect another principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
CE 1-1 | There is no formal training program to help make employees aware of the importance of adherence to the standards of conduct. | Y | While individually this may not be a major deficiency, when considered in combination with CE 1-2 and CE 1-3, it has been determined that this is a major deficiency. This is not compensated for by controls in other principles. | |
CE 1-2 | The company does not have processes in place to evaluate individuals against the published integrity and ethics policy. | Y | While individually this may not be a major deficiency, when considered in combination with CE 1-1 and CE 1-3 it has been determined that this is a major deficiency. This is not compensated for by controls in other principles. | |
CE1-3 | Processes to identify and address deviations are ah-hoc in the organization. | Y | While individually this may not be a major deficiency, when considered in combination with CE 1-1 and CE 1-2 it has been determined that this is a major deficiency. This is not compensated for by controls in other principles. | |
Present? (Y/N) | Functioning? (Y/N) | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
2. Exercises Oversight Responsibility—The board of directors demonstrates independence from management and exercises oversight for the development and performance of internal control. | Y | Y | The internal control deficiencies noted in Principle 2 (CE 2-1 and CE 2-2) are relatively minor and are compensated for by other controls (see Comments/ Compensating Controls). | |
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate internal control deficiency severity: (Consider whether the controls to effect another principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
CE 2-1 | While the charter indicates that the board should review management's assessment of risk, this review is not formally documented. | N | This is primarily a documentation issue—the board does review the risk assessment. | |
CE 2-2 | The board does not formally document its review of remediation plans and monitoring activities. | N | The remediation plans for deficiencies are also reviewed by the board, but not formally documented. Compensating control: The remediation activity and its completion are monitored by operational management. | |
Present? (Y/N) | Functioning? (Y/N) | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
3. Establishes Structure, Authority, and Responsibility— Management establishes, with board oversight, structures, reporting lines, and appropriate authorities and responsibilities in the pursuit of objectives. | Y | Y | Oversight and control structures have not evolved to keep pace with changes in the business (see deficiency 3-1). | |
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate internal control deficiency severity: (Consider whether the controls to effect another principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
CE 3-1 | Management has defined and the board of directors has signed off on the company's structures, reporting lines, and authorities and responsibilities; however, the business model has since evolved to encompass business partners, outsourced service providers, and new product lines. As a result, new or different oversight and control structures are needed. Internal control weaknesses relating to this new dimension of the business could therefore be missed and cause the company to fall short of meeting its internal financial reporting objectives. | N | This internal control deficiency is important, but does not rise to the level of a major deficiency. Currently, the business structure changes only affect a small portion of the entity. | |
Present? (Y/N) | Functioning? (Y/N) | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
4. Demonstrates Commitment to Competence—The organization demonstrates a commitment to attract, develop, and retain competent individuals in alignment with objectives. | Y | Y | No internal control deficiencies noted. | |
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate internal control deficiency severity: Consider whether the controls to effect another principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Present? (Y/N) | Functioning? (Y/N) | Explanation/Conclusion | ||
5. Enforces Accountability—The organization holds individuals accountable for their internal control responsibilities in the pursuit of objectives. | N | N | The incentive structure represents an internal control deficiency (see internal control deficiency CE 5-1). | |
Identification No. | Internal control deficiency description | Evaluate internal control deficiency severity: Consider whether the controls to effect another principle compensate for the internal control deficiency.) | List internal control deficiencies related to another principle that may impact this internal control deficiency | |
Is internal control deficiency a major deficiency? (Y/N) | Comments/ Compensating Controls | |||
CE 5-1 | The compensation structure for senior management is heavily weighted toward sales incentive bonuses as compared to salary. This may contribute to excessive pressure to meet business targets and produce favorable internal financial reports. | Y | There is no evidence that any consideration has been given to the pressures that may result or mitigating controls in place. | CE 1-1, CE 1-2, CE 1-3 |
Explanation/Conclusion | ||||
Evaluate deficiencies across the component:* Evaluate if any internal control deficiencies or combination of internal control deficiencies, when considered across the component, represent a major deficiency.** | Major deficiencies noted in Principles 1 and 5 | |||
Evaluate the component using judgment and based on the principles and the deficiencies.** | Yes/No | Explain | ||
Is the component present? | N | Major deficiencies noted. | ||
Is the component functioning? | N | As the component is not present, it is also not functioning. | ||
* Note: Record deficiencies in Summary of Deficiencies Template. ** If it is determined that there is a major deficiency, then management must conclude that the component is not present and functioning and the system of internal control is not effective. |
fn 5 Once it is determined that the internal control deficiencies, when considered across the principle, rise to the level of a major deficiency, management should adjust the preliminary severity analysis to reflect each internal control deficiency as a major deficiency.
Generated November 10, 2014 20:30:53 |